'A wolf in sheeps clothing'




(archive)
3-25-08

Super Future Equities, Inc. vs. Wells Fargo, ORIX, John Dinan, Michael Wurst, Clifford Weiner, James Thompson, and KeyCorp

In hindsight, and in light of recent news about the "subprime fallout", "mortgage failures", and "toxic bonds" plaguing financial institutions, its now obvious (even if your biased, deep down you know it ) that SFE was 110% right (im throwing them an extra 10% for being correct a year in advance).

When the complaint was first filed, it became widely popular in the financial markets news, although it never quite got the attention it deserved. It was featured and discussed on dozens of blogs. Many were curious (at least those that understood it) to see whether or not the allegations were true and whether or not these things were really happening to trusts (see pictures below). Reading it two years after the original complaint was filed, it all makes much more sense to the average reader.

Here we are (Q1 '08), two years after the complaint was filed (Q1 '06) and a year after the mortgage backed securities mess hit the fan (Q3 '07).
Read the complaint again, itll make more sense :-)

I totally called it, months in advance:

Super Future Equities, Inc. vs. Wells Fargo and ORIX
Predatorix Was Right




news | cases | documents | studies | multimedia | other | about